Archive for the ‘Health’ Category

Toxic Plastics – Not Just BPA

Friday, March 4th, 2011

by Catherine Haug, March 2, 2011 (photo from NPR article)

We’ve all heard that BPA, the plastic used in water bottles, is toxic because it mimics estrogen, and is classified as an endocrine disrupter. Because of this, most of us avoid food and water products in containers containing BPA: soda bottles, water bottles, canned foods, and traditional home canning lids.

In response, you’ve probably heard me say that all plastics are toxic, even if the media hasn’t reported it, or science hasn’t proved it yet. Furthermore, the production of plastic is not sustainable, whether it is made from petroleum or food crops.

Today, National Public Radio (NPR) released a story by Jon Hamilton: Study: Most Plastics Leach Hormone-Like Chemicals (1) that vindicates my belief for ‘most’ plastics.

This study only looked at hormone-like activity. There are also other ways in which plastics can be toxic; will the remaining ‘safe’ plastics someday be found to be unsafe too?

What about those you use in your home?

(more…)

His & Hers: Matters of the Heart

Monday, February 14th, 2011

by Catherine Haug, February 14, 2011 (copied to catsfork.com/CatsKitchen 6/19/21)

Clip art, right, from Webweaver’s Clip art (11)

On this Valentine’s Day, I’d like to draw your attention to the differences between men and women when it comes to matters of the heart.

I had a “false” heart attack (see Neuromuscular Spasms section below) on December 23, 2010 and spent the holiday weekend in the hospital. Until the results of the enzyme test came back, the doc didn’t think I’d had a heart attack, believing instead it was heartburn. Especially since my EKG was normal. My enzymes, however, told a different story. They were slightly elevated indicating I’d truly had a lapse of oxygen to my heart. I was checked into the hospital for the holiday weekend, for tests.

The results of those tests were good news: Echogram indicated normal size heart with no loss of muscle; Angiogram indicated no plaque in my arteries with no blockages and no need for stents. But what, then, caused the heart attack? And why did I recover so quickly?

It turns out that the hearts of men and women are different, and the cause for attacks in women can be entirely different from that in men. Because of this difference, women’s attacks are routinely dismissed as heartburn, pulled muscle, overwork, etc.. In short, women are not being diagnosed and treated for a problem that could kill them.

So, then, what are the differences?

(more…)

Soap vs Detergents

Friday, February 4th, 2011

by Catherine Haug, January 28, 2011

At the suggestion of our audience (at our recent gathering on Making Soaps at Home, with Kathy Mansfield), I promised to write a post on how to tell a soap from a detergent on an ingredient list.

2015 update: I just found a very helpful website, regarding deciphering the ingredient list on personal and body-care products: Terre Essentials: Ingredient Guide (for personal and body-care products).

(more…)

Natural Shampoo & Rinse – Updated

Saturday, January 29th, 2011

by Catherine Haug (originally published on 7/9/2009; updated and republished Jan 29, 2010)

When we find empty shelves at the grocer and chain stores (due to unavailability or high expense of fuel), what will we do?

As ESP pursues healthful and local sources for essentials, we wonder about shampoo and rinse for cleaning hair.  Most shampoos available in the American marketplace are synthetic cleansers, technically termed ‘detergents,’ and cannot be made in your kitchen.

Even Organic brands, such as Avalon, are synthetic, albeit synthesized from natural organic substances (like coconut oil), and cannot be made in your kitchen. (For more on this, refer to the Coming Clean Info Sheet by the Organic Consumers Association).

So what’s an essentials-minded person to do?

The answer is soap and vinegar, both of which can be made in your kitchen!  How cool is that? (more…)

Patenting of Isolated DNA Material

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

by Catherine Haug

According to a news report from the New York Times (“U.S. Says Genes Should Not be Eligible for Patents,” by Andrew Pollack, Oct 29, 2010):

“Reversing a longstanding policy, the federal government said on Friday that human and other genes should not be eligible for patents because they are part of nature. The new position could have a huge impact on medicine and on the biotechnology industry.

The new position was declared in a friend-of-the-court brief filed by the Department of Justice late Friday in a case involving two human genes linked to breast and ovarian cancer.” (1,2)

This ruling directly affects current and future “development of diagnostic tests, drugs and the emerging field of personalized medicine, in which drugs are tailored for individual patients based on their genes.”(1)

So I wonder, what does this mean for Genetically Engineered (GMO) crops, and foods? (more…)

More on Honeybee CCD Discovery

Saturday, October 30th, 2010

by Catherine Haug

Earlier this month (Oct 10) I wrote a post: Honeybee Colony Collapse Disorder Explained? based on an article in the New York Times, Oct 6, 2010 (1) and his published research article (2). From my post, the latest research by Dr. Jerry Bromenshenk from UM points to:

A lethal combination of a virus (Invertebrate Iridescent Virus or IIV) and a fungal parasite (Nosema ceranae). The bees are able to fight off an infection of either one of these, but when both are present, the bees succumb and die. This deadly combo was found in “virtually all of the bees from CCD colonies” sampled from widely dispersed USA hives from 2006 through 2009.

Conflict of Interest?

Now it comes to light that Dr. Bromenshenk has a conflict of interest that was not disclosed when he published his findings. He received a huge grant from Bayer Crop Science, a company under pressure of lawsuits from beekeepers over the rampant use of pesticides, and specifically neonicotinoids manufactured by Bayer (see Fortune Magazine: What a scientist didn’t tell the New York Times about his study on bee deaths (3)).

I’m sure we’ll hear more about this in the future. Meanwhile, there’s a point I’d like to make about disease in general (not just in bees). (more…)