by Catherine Haug, Jan 15, 2012
Senators Baucus & Tester, and Representative Rehberg responded to recent comments from their constituency regarding GMOs. As you can see from the complete responses (below):
- Tester asserts that GMO foods should be labeled, and that there are unanswered questions regarding these foods that need to be addressed.
- Baucus supports GMO foods as being good for Montana’s Ag economy.
- Rehberg takes no stand either way, only saying that we need to be ready to make the right decisions based on sound evidence vs cost.
If you believe GMOs should be labeled; if you believe we should not approve any more GMO foods until we know more about the long-term affects on the health of our people, animals and the planet, you might address our legislators accordingly, and cast your votes for those who support your position.
On the other hand, if you believe that GMOs are no different (from a health and ecological perspective) than their non-GMO counterparts, then your address to our legislators or your vote may be different, but no less important.
If you are undecided on this important issue, you might want to read some of my earlier posts on GMOs; see the following link: Cat’s posts on GMOs.
For the complete responses from our legislators, read on. (more…)